Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【phim sex m?c kimono múa khiêu dam video.xxx】Enter to watch online.DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit

A class-action lawsuit against DoorDashis accusing the food delivery service of charging iPhone users more than customers who order via Android. It seems you could phim sex m?c kimono múa khiêu dam video.xxxbe paying for that blue message bubblein ways you didn't even realise.

Filed in the U.S. District Court of Maryland, the case alleges that DoorDash engages in "deceptive, misleading, and fraudulent practices" by hiding unfair fees behind certain labels.

Specifically, some DoorDash orders include an "expanded range" fee, ostensibly applied when a restaurant is outside the customer's "normal delivery area." The lawsuit claims DoorDash charges this expanded range fee in a variety of situations where it is uncalled for. This includes sending orders to restaurant locations further away from the customer in order to "justify" charging the expanded range fee, as well as charging the fee to paid DashPass Program users to subsidise revenue lost under the subscription plan.


You May Also Like

Significantly, the class-action lawsuit also accuses DoorDash of charging the expanded range fee to iPhone users but not Android users, even when they make the same order, at the same time, to be delivered to the same location.

"[A]s tests indicate, DoorDash charges the expanded range fee on iPhone users more often than Android users and charges iPhone users more for 'delivering' (likely because studies reveal iPhone users earn more),'" the lawsuit states. "These tactics are simply money grabs."

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The lawsuit also alleges that the app misleads customers into believing "normal delivery areas" are determined by geography, when in fact they are drawn according to how much a restaurant pays DoorDash.

SEE ALSO: Grubhub, DoorDash hit with lawsuit for 'deceptive and unfair' practices in Chicago

The suit contains a slew of other allegations as well, including claims that DoorDash's "city" fees mislead customers into believing the money is actually paid to the local government. The suit further claims that though DoorDash charges an optional "Express" fee of $3, the delivery service actually has no ability to hasten your order. This would mean paying DoorDash for expedited delivery may not get you fed any faster than if you just spent that $3 on a few extra sauce packets.

DoorDash denied the allegations in a statement to Mashable, and claimed that any discrepancy between pricing on different devices could potentially be due to gradual rollouts of new features.

"The claims put forward in the amended complaint are baseless and simply without merit," said a DoorDash spokesperson. "Our priority is to provide the best service possible and ensure there is clarity for consumers that allows them to make informed decisions. We ensure fees are disclosed throughout the customer experience, including on each restaurant storepage and before checkout. Building this trust is essential, and it’s why the majority of delivery orders on our platform are placed by return customers. We will continue to strive to make our platform work even better for customers, and will vigorously fight these allegations."


Related Stories
  • DoorDash data breach leaves important customer details exposed
  • DoorDash glitch results in hundreds of free food orders
  • Massive DoorDash hack exposes millions of customers' personal data
  • DoorDash will finally fix its controversial tipping structure
  • This is why DoorDash delivery workers usually prefer cash tips

This isn't the first time DoorDash's fee structure has come under judicial scrutiny. The company was previously the subject of a 2021 Chicago lawsuit, which alleged it used "bait-and-switch" tactics by initially displaying small delivery fees, then piling on additional costs at the end of an order. The suit also claimed DoorDash customers were misled about where their money was going, as "the customer 'tip' was used to subsidize DoorDash's own payment to its drivers," and the $1.50 "Chicago fee" went into DoorDash's pocket rather than to the city.

DoorDash further paid $2.5 million in 2020 to settle a D.C. lawsuitaccusing it of misleading customers as to where their tips actually went.

UPDATE: May. 23, 2023, 2:00 p.m. AEST This article has been updated with a statement from DoorDash.

Topics Apps & Software

0.1392s , 8280.2109375 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【phim sex m?c kimono múa khiêu dam video.xxx】Enter to watch online.DoorDash accused of charging iPhone users more than Android users in lawsuit,  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产三级三级三级在线观看 | 精品在线免费 | 亚洲AV久久久久久久无码 | 亚洲欧美色国产精品传媒 | 午夜亚洲福利在线老司机 | 久久国产精品久久久久久小说 | 午夜在线观看视频免费成人 | 国产精品99久久久久久猫咪 | 18禁无遮挡羞羞污污污污免费 | 日韩一区二区三区无码影院 | 2024国产三级| 国产v片在线播放—2024天天 | 国产精品亚洲第一区二区三区 | 一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片一级毛片 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区激情在线 | 亚洲国产日韩无在线播放 | 色情大尺度吃奶做爰在线观看 | 成年无码av片在线 | 精东影业传媒在线观看软件的优势 | 国产偷国产偷亚洲清高app | 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕一区二区三区 | 国产喷潮视频在线播放 | av天堂永久资源网av天堂下载 | 久久99国产精品久久99软件 | 狠狠色丁香九九婷婷综合五月 | 国产精品日韩 | 国产肥白大熟妇BBBB | 波多野结衣一区二区三区四区欧美剧高清在线观看 | 国产伦子系列沙发午睡 | 成人做爰69片免费看网站 | 国产亚洲人成人网站18禁止 | 免费看日韩A片无码视频软件 | 国产精品久久精品第一页不卡 | 亚洲三级免费 | 水蜜桃传媒科技有限公司网站 | 91精品久久人人 | 久久免费国产 | 白丝丝袜高跟国产在线视频 | 77777亚洲午夜久久多喷 | 2024国产在线观看不卡视频 | 亚洲爆乳精品无码一区二区 |