Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【twink athletes gay sex videos】Finger-Lickin’ Lulz
Katherine Cross ,twink athletes gay sex videos August 30, 2017

Finger-Lickin’ Lulz

Simulated terror meets deep-fried irony in KFC’s workplace-training schtick Watching over you. / Geoffrey Galloway
Word Factory W
o
r
d

F
a
c
t
o
r
y

Brands have broken through another frontier: they are relatablenow. When you talk to them, they tweet back at you, and what’s more, they’re up on (and ruining) the latest memes. If ever there was an argument that irony culture won’t save us, it surely lies in Denny’s absurdist, morose Twitter feed, which recently composed a “haiku” that reads, “like neglected bread / forgotten in the toaster / the heart can be burnt.”

Or, perhaps, evidence can be found in the new marketing oeuvre of Kentucky Fried Chicken.

KFC’s iconic Colonel has long been repurposed into a knowingly unsettling figure who seems to hail from the Uncanny Valley rather than a sanitized antebellum South, and the fast-food chain’s comedian-studded commercials bespeak an edgy creepiness clearly designed to appeal to the ironies of Millennial humor. Now that’s all gone virtual.

As part of a big media to-do this past week, KFC enticed the press into trying its new virtual reality training simulator, entitled “The Hard Way.” The game uses the Oculus Rift system to create the impression of being trapped in an escape room with the disembodied voice of Colonel Sanders. You can’t leave until you learn how to cook chicken the KFC way. Like so much of the meme-loving fuckery that corporations have recently gotten addicted to, this is entirely about selling something intangible to you: a feeling, a mood, the sense that the Brand “gets it” and is a human, just like you.

They’re cool because they get how weird it is that their mascot is a long-dead white man in a white suit.

That its tone, from the eerie sound effects to the unsettling remixes of the Colonel’s unblinking smile, is so in line with the television commercials isn’t a coincidence: this training exercise is part of KFC’s new brand. With a wink and a nod, they’re cool because they get how weird it is that their mascot is a long-dead white man in a white suit; they’re down with us, they know we know it’s all a bit dodgy. And so on, and so on.

But all that nonsense is merely cause to roll one’s eyes and move on. What’s trulyworrying is how this has been sold to the press as a “training simulation.” The game’s trailer, available on YouTube, ends with a splash of “EMPLOYEES ONLY,” after all. The Hard Way was presented to the press gaggle as an innovation in workplace training. But as Engadget’s report on the matter makes clear, with Oculus Rift headsets costing $500 a pop, it’s not the most scaleable idea in KFC’s universe of franchised restaurants—for the moment. But this is a gimmicky trial balloon that should nevertheless get us all thinking critically about how new technologies will be used in corporate environments, and it provides clues about how they might even be used to circumvent hard-won workplace regulations.

KFC’s creepily tech-savvy publicity stunt is but a hint of things to come in the exciting world of late capitalism’s cyberpunk dystopia.


Virtual reality is the apotheosis of that great contradiction at the heart of networked technology: like KFC’s ironic pose, it’s real when that’s a selling point, unreal when that presents problems. Virtual reality is “just like the real thing” when it helps to move product, but “it’s just a game” when there are unpleasant side effects to its verisimilitude—as we saw with the reaction to a woman being sexually assaulted in a popular virtual reality game. This two-step has long been at the heart of Silicon Valley: sell the thing using pretensions to reality, deny any responsibility by saying it’s notreal. Here, of course, lies the heart of discourse around online harassment and abuse, as well. Real when convenient, unreal when not.

That same two-step also shapes how companies like Uber or Deliveroo approach labor rights: sell a product whose appeal lies in the full-time commitment of the workers producing it, deny that they’re anything more that “contractors” when trouble comes knocking; Uber doesn’t run a taxi network, it merely administers an app. But as virtual reality moves into the workplace, potentially as a “training” tool, it’s a productive question for unions and worker’s rights organisations to ask: Will companies abuse their employees using these tools, and will they use this same denial of reality to disclaim responsibility for them?

The experience of the tech journalists, who could leave anytime they wished, will surely be qualitatively different from fry cooks who can’t.

Consider the basic conceit of the KFC game. You’re in a locked room and can’t escape unless you learn to cook chicken according to corporate spec. A company couldn’t do this in physical reality without courting fines, lawsuits, and scandal, but when they dress it up as a game, it suddenly becomes cutting-edge and “fun.” But the mediating interface of a game does not make “simulated” abusive behavior any less abusive—and the experience of the tech journalists, who could leave anytime they wished, will surely be qualitatively different from fry cooks who can’t.?Even Vice’s Waypoint, which dubbed the game “deliciously strange” and “delightfully witty,” had to admit that “the detail of having the player ringed by security cameras is a little too familiar to anyone who has worked a service job.”

At the moment, it’s a cute, ironically unsettling game that’s totally On Brand?, but how long until this technology is repurposed in such a way that it allows a corporation to get really invasive with its employees, and circumvent the threadbare regulations that protect them?

As of now, there are no OSHA regulations regarding the use of virtual reality in the workplace. Even as all signs point to the fact that virtual reality is real, everything is still a Wild West, so far as both the gaming industry and its clients are concerned. There are no codified ethical standards for the use of virtual reality or its twin augmented reality, which uses an interface like Google Glass or a mobile device to superimpose images onto the physical world. At the moment, it’s entirely legal to compel employees to take trainings—and as we know, it’s long been permissible for corporations like Target and Wal-Mart to routinely force their employees to watch anti-union propaganda. It’s not a dramatic leap to imagine them ordering their employees to wear an Oculus ?headset and endure a terrorizing simulation that keeps them isolated and “in line.”

Simulating terror for fast-food employees serves only the interests of a class of corporate overseers.

An objection to this argument might be raised: pilots have been training in a rudimentary version of virtual reality for years, why is thisnot a problem? Well, one has to think about what a flight simulator is really for, for one thing. It’s meant to drill the pilot with such rigor that they all-but-automatically perform certain tasks, even under extraordinary pressure. Developed for training in the First World War, it’s meant to make certain procedures or maneuvers second nature to them.?The point of a simulator is to give the pilot a controlled environment that, nevertheless, perfectly replicates the real thing. This disorientation training allows them to practise responding to an emergency, a scenario where up is down and everything is screaming alarms and flashing lights. Precisely through?the simulated trauma and horror, a pilot can learn to react calmly in an actual emergency. But this depends on the simulation’s ability to meaningfully recreate that moment of abject fright.

Thus, yes, a simulated environment can create terror. But while this experience is necessary for a pilot, who must be able to respond in such a situation, it is not necessary for the majority of service workers who could, nevertheless, be terrorized by the creative simulations of their capricious bosses. The terror simulation of an airline pilot works to the good of all involved; simulating terror for fast-food employees serves only the interests of a class of corporate overseers.

More than ever, organised labor can’t afford to fight the last war. The digital frontier is rapidly approaching and we must be ready for the way in which corporations will, inevitably, use emergent technologies to find new and creative ways of limiting workers’ rights. While the current news cycle finds KFC’s quirky virtual reality game to be a bit of a relief from our deeply trying age, there’s reason to see it as a harbinger of something both real and worse.

0.1256s , 14240.0078125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【twink athletes gay sex videos】Finger-Lickin’ Lulz,Info Circulation  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产最新无码专区在线 | 国产欧美另类久久精品蜜芽 | 国产v综合v亚洲欧美大另类 | 成人综合国产成人亚洲 | 日本高清视频不卡 | 国产亚洲精品在线视频一 | 欧美又粗又深又猛又爽A片免费看 | 少妇做爰喷水高潮呻吟A片免费 | 日韩欧美人妻视频 | 黄色亚洲网站 | 日韩一区二区三区视频在线播放 | 伊人成综合网 | 国产精品成人综合网 | 亚洲熟妇熟女久久精品综合一 | 欧美激情∨在线视频播放 | 青青草国产成人久久91网 | 中文字幕乱码人妻无码久久激情 | 国内偷拍2024在线偷拍视频 | 久久国产精品张柏芝 | 国产欧美精品一区二区三 | 国产欧美精品自在拍一区二区不卡 | 国产国语特级一级aa毛片 | 久久精品一区二区电影深喉 | 另类专区另类专区亚洲 | 精品熟女少妇AV久久免费A片 | 成人黄18免费视频 | 免费看999永久A片视频 | 无码不卡免费高 | 国产啪在线| 国产高清视频一区二区在线 | 香港三级日本三级妇三级 | 青青草在视频线首页 | 波多野结衣中文字 | 亚洲色欲色欲www在线观看 | 蜜臀AV色欲A片无人一区 | 91精品国产aⅴ一区二区 | 国产精品农村妇女一二区 | 囯产精品视频一区二区三区99 | 麻豆国产尤物av尤物在线观看 | 精品无码一区二区三区蜜桃 | 精品日韩欧美国产一区二 |