Set as Homepage - Add to Favorites

精品东京热,精品动漫无码,精品动漫一区,精品动漫一区二区,精品动漫一区二区三区,精品二三四区,精品福利导航,精品福利導航。

【порнографии куни】EPA will now classify wood burning as carbon neutral, except it isn't

Under a new Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy unveiled on порнографии куниMonday, burning forest products, known as biomass, will now be considered a "carbon neutral" fuel source.

The EPA's action, which EPA administrator Scott Pruitt announced before an audience of Georgia timber industry leaders, for now settles the question of whether chopping down trees, turning them into wood pellets, and then shipping them to power plants where they're burned for fuel will be counted as a renewable source of fuel like solar panels or wind turbines.

SEE ALSO: Here's a running list of all the Scott Pruitt scandals

This action comes before the agency's own Scientific Advisory Board could decide on how to account for the emissions of carbon dioxide, which is the main long-lived greenhouse gas responsible for global warming. Proponents of this policy, such as Pruitt, argue that regrowing forests after they are cut down absorbs carbon dioxide, and therefore balances out the emissions from cutting down and burning trees in the first place.

“Today’s announcement grants America’s foresters much-needed certainty and clarity with respect to the carbon neutrality of forest biomass,” Pruitt said in a press release.

While Pruitt and other proponents of counting wood-derived bioenergy as carbon neutral are right that trees grow back, and can become net absorbers, or “sinks,” of carbon again, the problem involves a mismatch in timescales. A forest that’s been cut down for wood pellets that are burned in a power plant in England, for example, might take 100 years to grow back to its full carbon absorbing potential. During that time, more carbon dioxide emissions would’ve caused global warming to worsen, with irreversible impacts.

Mashable ImageWood pellets. Credit: Photothek via Getty Images

Globally, forests absorb about one-third of annual human-caused carbon emissions, and in the U.S. that figure is about 11.2 percent, the EPA said. Cutting forests and burning them for energy would reduce that amount of absorption at a time when countries are struggling to cut emissions steeply enough to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius, or 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit, above preindustrial levels by 2100.

In fact, a report last year from the UK-based Chatham House think tank found that, when emissions and carbon absorption are fully accounted for, along with the emissions from transporting wood pellets to power plants, bioenergy involves about as much carbon emissions as coal. Burning wood to produce steam for electricity may even be 50 percent more carbon intensive than coal per unit of electricity produced, the report found. 

According to William Moomaw, a scientist specializing in forests' role in climate change at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, the EPA's decision was made with "zero consultation" with agency scientists or its Science Advisory Board. "It's pretty amazing," he said, of the process that went into the policy announcement.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The EPA decision gives a boost to U.S. foresters that are clear-cutting forests to export wood pellets to Europe, which is the largest market for bioenergy. It also clears the path for more wood-burning within the U.S.

"Between this and the Europeans it means no chance of staying within the 2-degree limit," Moomaw said in an interview, "It's just not possible."

"It's a bad idea because anything that has carbon in it produces carbon dioxide when you burn it," he said. "This is horrific."

In a statement, Andres Villegas, the president and CEO of the Georgia Forestry Association said that EPA's announcement, "Reflects the clear scientific consensus on forest biomass.”

“The Agency’s recognition of biomass as a renewable, carbon neutral source of energy will maintain and enhance markets for small-diameter trees, which encourages landowners to invest in forest health, and ultimately, to keep their land in trees," Villegas said.

However, the lack of consensus on the EPA's own Science Advisory Board indicates how controversial bioenergy policies are in the scientific community, with many researchers sharing Moomaw's view that forests should be left intact, and renewables such as solar and wind should be encouraged instead.

Scientists and environmentalists who oppose the new policy say that there are few guarantees that landowners will maintain the land in such a way to allow forests to grow back to the exact state they’re in today, and in fact climate change itself may make that impossible to do.

The scale of the bioenergy trade is growing, however. The British alone are spending about $1 billion a year to import wood pellets from the U.S., and are counting it as a carbon neutral form of energy, Moomaw said. The U.S. has been exporting about 5 million tons of wood pellets per year, mostly from forests in Georgia and the Carolinas.

Moomaw pointed out that even if the forests regrow, by the time they will again be absorbing comparable amounts of carbon dioxide to today's intact forests, it will be too late for the climate.

"If it regrows and we did get to climate neutrality sometime maybe 100 years from now the climate would have irreversibly changed a number of things," he said. "The carbon dioxide in the air will have warmed the planet... When the tree regrows the glacier doesn't regrow," he said. "The climate change effects are irreversible."

"Carbon neutrality is not climate neutrality."


Featured Video For You

0.1207s , 9826.203125 kb

Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【порнографии куни】EPA will now classify wood burning as carbon neutral, except it isn't,Info Circulation  

Sitemap

Top 主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲人妻日韩精品 | jizz韩国天天爱久久久伦 | 蜜桃秘做爰免费网站 | 色婷婷综合久久久中文字幕 | 亚洲国产大片在线观看 | 天天日天天色天天操 | 国产涩涩视频在线观看 | 国产成人福利美女观看视频 | 丁香五月婷婷五月天激 | 日韩av无码免费播放 | 少妇高潮毛片免费看A片 | 国产乱伦精品一区三上 | 欧洲国产成人精品91软件 | 亚洲欧洲精品久久无码 | 日本一本二本三本区在线观看完整版 | 男女一边摸一边做爽爽的免费文字 | 亚洲av真人在线播放 | 久久久久久精品国产免 | 成年女人毛片免费视频 | 精品成人av一区二区三区 | 精品夜色国产国偷自产在线 | 亚洲国产另类精品 | 欧美日本国产mv大片 | 久久久精品人妻无码专区不卡 | 国产精品毛片a一区二区三 国产精品毛片a一区二区三区 | 国产白丝jk被疯狂输出视频 | 欧美中文字幕在线视频 | 少妇寂寞福利在线 | 久久久国产一区二区三区四区小说 | 国内精品久久久久影院老司 | 国产又色又爽又黄的网站在线一级 | 色情成人免费视频激情在线观看 | 99在线精品免费视频 | 日韩精品无码免费一区二区三区 | 国产成a人亚洲精v品无码不卡 | 欧美日韩在线一区 | 精品国产你懂的在线观看 | 精品人妻无码一区二区色欲aⅴ | 日本理伦片午夜理伦 | 久久国产乱子乱免费无码 | 99国内自产精华 |